点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
江西“90后”男孩带瘫痪母亲上学 ：我就是妈妈的双腿******
中新网南昌1月12日电 题：江西“90后”男孩带瘫痪母亲上学：我就是妈妈的双腿
作者 刘玉洁
“我就是妈妈的双腿，带着她走向幸福生活。”11日，南昌航空大学软件学院硕士研究生赵建军说道。
2018年9月，赵建军父母遭遇车祸，父亲重伤、母亲瘫痪，21岁的赵建军便主动承担起照顾母亲的重任，在医院照顾母亲两年。“手术后住在ICU里只能喝流食，我就在医院附近租了一个小房间，每天煮好粥送到妈妈的病床前，一勺一勺吹凉了喂给妈妈。”
长期卧躺容易造成血液流通不畅，赵建军便每隔几个小时帮母亲按摩、敷腿，晚上睡在病床旁，帮母亲翻身，换水垫。“从ICU病房到普通病房，这两年妈妈不想让我看到她难过的样子，所以大多时间都是笑着的，我也是笑着的，笑着笑着，感觉一切都会好起来。”
“妈妈常说，再苦再难，都不要放弃读书，要坚持你自己的梦想。在医院的这两年，每当晚上妈妈睡着后，我就去医院的走廊或楼梯间去背考研的英语、政治。”赵建军回忆道，病床旁边放不下太多的书本，自己便去病房外的长椅上做数学试卷备考研究生考试。
“研究生考试成绩公布后，我的成绩高出南昌航空大学分数线60分，随后也顺利通过了面试。但这个时候我很纠结，不知道如何一边照顾妈妈，一边完成学业。”赵建军告诉记者，校方得知情况后，为他开了“后门”，将他和母亲安排住在一间一楼的宿舍，并且免除了房租和水电费。
赵建军背着母亲下楼。受访者供图“妈妈在我身边好照顾，不在我身边我也不放心。”对于学校提供的方便，赵建军颇为感激，这让他既能安心上学又方便照顾母亲。
“在妈妈病情稳定后，我便从医院带着她来到学校，开始了‘带母求学’之路。”每天早上不到六点就起床，为母亲洗漱、按摩、做早餐。在安顿好母亲后，赵建军便匆匆前往实验室学习。晚上回到宿舍，临睡前，再给母亲洗脚按摩，做康复运动。
“这几年里，我去过了南昌几乎所有三甲医院的每个角落，对医院的挂号、问诊、陪护、出入院等流程都无比熟悉。”天气好时，赵建军只要有时间就会用轮椅推着母亲去校园晒晒太阳，看看校园、讲讲趣事。
“看着妈妈笑容越来越多起来，感觉所做一切都是值得的。”赵建军说道，身边部分同学受到他的影响，从基本不给父母打电话，到现在每星期都和父母联系了。
“这一路走来，有太多人帮助我，我也希望能够成为给予别人光明的人。”如今，赵建军母亲可以拿掉拐杖，自己走一点路，赵建军便在空闲时间参加各种志愿活动。
赵建军说，一路走来，他受到了很多人的帮助，毕业后他希望尽自己所能去帮助他人，同时感谢那些帮助过自己的人。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)